KulikPete (May 11, 2008 at 12:40 am)

ur a saccone

rul3t3ro (May 6, 2008 at 3:14 pm)

Do you want to win 50 +100 bonus to play poker? write to ch3l3ropoker @ gmail and I will send you the data so you know what to do lucky

Ovieutz (May 2, 2008 at 12:28 am)

15 was the $1,500 No Limit Hold'em Event

rico305305 (April 28, 2008 at 9:53 am)

in life someone has to win and someone has to lose! phil is no genius....he is just LUCKY enough to be on the winning side. cause in poker there are no gaurantees!!!!

deesyphrr (April 25, 2008 at 8:35 pm)

What was event 15? Low buy-in?

MrAndersonmm (April 23, 2008 at 4:45 am)

That's the last time Johnny Chan won the main event, he won a bracelet in '05 or '06, maybe both, it was Pot Limit Hold 'em heads up with Phil Laak.

MrAndersonmm (April 23, 2008 at 4:44 am)

There are several more situations in Omaha, especially in Pot Limit Omaha, where it's correct for two or three people to be all in, top set against a wrap straight draw against bottom set with a flush draw, all great all-in hands. Omaha is much more of an action game, but it leaves less for outplaying other people, it's much more straight-forward.Not harder, not easier, just different.

Nemesis000000 (April 19, 2008 at 4:37 am)

Omaha is more complex in terms of odds and possible hands for your opponents. I dont see how anyone could consider it easier than holdem, or even on par.

pokerchobo (April 17, 2008 at 4:09 pm)

the commentator is so dumb "phil called with A3, his oponnent was playing so tight" bla bla the blinds are 60k/120k and moved all in thats just 4BB instant call with K high fish

hoosierlooker (April 12, 2008 at 5:30 am)

That sounded like Tony Bruno on the play by play.