MRyanBB (July 26, 2008 at 10:28 pm)

I guess there was none, going that fast when it hit.

SharkGoddesspt2 (July 26, 2008 at 10:19 pm)

TikiWHAT? You wrote goobly gook. I'm NOT the immature 1. Now what is the topic I wouldn't address IF I'm working for the govt? What is it? >>>>>>"But my question to you Shark, on the topic of vigilance - isn't a topic you would "yak over" or blow off - IGNORE if you are a USConstitutional Loyalist or are NOT shilling for Zionist/Freemasonry/CFR/Elite NWO perps. You would dare to address it because you would not be discounting the rights of free speech and the redress of government..."

RLiebenstein1 (July 26, 2008 at 9:27 pm)

The shills are being overtaken. You can't ban the truth and the government can't hire you liars fast enough to outrun the truth!Youtube search our new videos and feel free to leave comments. Thanks!:FLIGHT 93 SHOCKING TRUTH!ROCKEFELLER EVIL

tiktoffG13 (July 26, 2008 at 9:23 pm)

Clock's a tickin, kid. Show us what you got. Or don't. S'up to you. As stated, those are the options. And those are the possible modus operandii for your immature goading and baiting, and for the cyclical manner in which you and other shills apply them. Once again. We hear what you are not but you deny us any avenue of understanding how you could be so naive and cocky. tikitikitiki, SharkGoddess.

SharkGoddesspt2 (July 26, 2008 at 7:17 pm)

TikiCome on, chop chop, what is it you think I won't address?? I'm waiting. Are you ignoring ME because I called your bluff and am willing to address it, whatever it is??

SharkGoddesspt2 (July 26, 2008 at 7:01 pm)

TikiYou still have YET to bring about any evidence of it at all. So you're basically lying at this point. Get this, I work for ME, MYSELF and I, as in ME and only ME.

SharkGoddesspt2 (July 26, 2008 at 6:57 pm)

Tiki Address what exactly. What topic is it you think I won't dive into? What is it you think I won't dive into? I'm not exactly reading all your posts word per word now because they tend to be absurdly irrevelvant and just plain absurd. Therefore they're a waste of time to try to make any sense of them.

tiktoffG13 (July 26, 2008 at 6:55 pm)

1. You'd (Shark) most definitely be an SCL dt CC type shill. One who was very dangerous to his/her SCL operation, and to the specific people who contracted - by proxy or agency or otherwise - the propaganda.

tiktoffG13 (July 26, 2008 at 6:51 pm)

3g. Instead of simply doing your juvie spitball shooter (figurative) thing on every page of this, and other threads you post on. Vigilance is not served by examining the examiners. This shit is not about what you can get away with. For perps it is. But not for those convinced there is a whole lot that has gone on behind the scenes. From Gonzales on up. And substantially higher than the Bungling Bushes' Circus where you'd love ppl to believe all the $bucks$ stop. Ergo/Or...

tiktoffG13 (July 26, 2008 at 6:38 pm)

3f. But my question to you Shark, on the topic of vigilance - isn't a topic you would "yak over" or blow off - IGNORE if you are a USConstitutional Loyalist or are NOT shilling for Zionist/Freemasonry/CFR/Elite NWO perps. You would dare to address it because you would not be discounting the rights of free speech and the redress of government. No. Loyal Americans would dive into that topic. Why. Because as you claim you are not here to hide or squelch or bully or assume anything.