vitusvivi (May 23, 2008 at 10:55 am)

fucking idiot the 3rd one was shit without him HE FUCKING RUINED IT WITHOUT HIM IN IT!!!!!

Fusere (May 22, 2008 at 1:01 am)

yeh i was talking to the one i replied to with ''u'', in the english language people tend to do that LOLLLLLL.

Graymalkin2001 (May 22, 2008 at 12:52 am)

"u"?

NyCSc4rf4c3 (May 20, 2008 at 7:06 pm)

Lol at the end when that guy says Duvall looks like Peter Boyle.. He doesn't like that if you take a look on how Duvall reacts xD

donamarg (May 18, 2008 at 11:36 pm)

nooo i TOMS A G

Fusere (May 13, 2008 at 6:07 pm)

part 3 was not the best of them all no, but dont say that was because of duvall. Cus people will laugh at u when u think that in a movie with brando, pacino, de niro( the 3 greatest of all time, in that order) duvall is a vital part. Part 3 was rubbish because the movie just sucked, the story was finished in part 2, like he said it was just for the money. Thats the reason the movie was not the same, not because of duvall missing lollll.

IvarTheBoneIess (May 11, 2008 at 10:15 pm)

why is he green

laksa72 (May 11, 2008 at 5:58 am)

With or without Duvall, part 3 is not going to be a msterpiece.

paganiniGOGO (April 28, 2008 at 2:33 am)

is there something wrong with the colour or do they both have jaundice

VladTzepesh (April 17, 2008 at 8:56 pm)

Part 3 sucked indeed. Don Corleone is really changed in part 3. He reminds me more of Tony Montana (Scarface) then the old Don Corleone.