Blastinrails (July 25, 2008 at 10:52 pm)

Yet your hero that posted this video stated trees in asia and northern america "evolved" together so if u dont agree or disagree with this video why are you here LOL

frateradrastus (July 25, 2008 at 10:32 pm)

Interesting idea and a great little graphic, but I take anything that claims a "conspiracy of science" and that they have the 'real answer' with a suspicion.

XXdrunkenxx87 (July 25, 2008 at 9:15 pm)

john goodman? dude you sound like the fat husband from rosanne im sorry thats just funny

superwar (July 25, 2008 at 8:20 pm)

umm this may be true. Although Ocean covers 70% of earth, ocean mass is only 0.023% of earth mass. So even if earth was 50% smaller, there would still have lands.Maybe the young earth was very hot and like lava very soft. The self rotation expanded earth and then it cooled down, so it does not expand much today.

twomells (July 25, 2008 at 7:30 pm)

if none of you have heard of the microchip id you should never get it as soon as you get one you sold your rights away

Diamonddavej (July 25, 2008 at 4:05 pm)

Neal, you should not expect success in science based on your prior accomplishments in art; just as I cannot claim to be an artist having earned a PhD in geology.

Enginmaster (July 25, 2008 at 3:56 pm)

Question, if you're too careful to fail, why aren't you careful enough to realize that the van allen belts aren't segregated into ions and electrons, as clearly there are both in both belts, and during heavy solar activity, the gap has been known to disappea?Why would someone too careful to fail make the pre Rennaissance era mistake of thinking larger objects fall faster, when to parts per trillion for sizes up to that of Earth and the moon, nasa's shown they don't? Use data, not speculation.

Enginmaster (July 25, 2008 at 3:39 pm)

"takes someone, each generation to kick the crap out of it and sweep out the old stupid ideas and emplace new and better ideas. That's MY JOB." -neilWell the only problem is the current science, and indeed science in general for the past couple hundred years has always been held to its own high standard through endless testing and gathering of data, which you refuse to do. And the other problem is, you need to know science before you can say why it should change. You don't know it at all.

nealadamsdotcom (July 25, 2008 at 2:47 pm)

Stimulus. Opposed to the principles of art.I HAVE MADE COMIC BOOKS,...COMIC BOOKS.....INTO AN ART FORM! And along the way turned it an all the rules of art and the business of "art" upside down. Like science, art is evolutionary and takes someone, each generation to kick the crap out of it and sweep out the old stupid ideas and emplace new and better ideas. That's MY JOB. Work with me or I'll run over you, no matter what you think. I've DONE MY HOMEWORK! Oh,..I'm too careful to fail

flangelet (July 25, 2008 at 2:09 pm)

THIS THEORY IS JUST SOME GODBOTHERER'S ATTEMPT TO PROVE THE LAND SUFACE ALL HAS THE SAME AGE... ie. god made it!For PROOF of subduction and a collosal age for the Earth, see volcanos.Volcanos vent steam that was once SEA WATER from rock that has sunk under its own weight into the molten rock beneath a tectonic plate and the water rises... forming a volcano.Hey, don't take my word for it, read some more! Google it!