|
BadMunckY (July 7, 2008 at 2:03 pm)
That's so dumb(hey btw check out what happened in Chile and who are the economists behind these atrocities)Freedom maybe for rich healthy people, for the rest it barely means more than freedom to choose between wearing a pair of nike or converse. Hayek, Friedman... crazy bitches to me.But judging from the movie "The Corporation" it must be ironical... I hope. I strongly recommend it btw.
bmtimv (July 4, 2008 at 9:16 pm)
rip milton friedman
o0xst (July 4, 2008 at 3:43 am)
oh yah...chile, '73..roe v. wade '73
o0xst (July 4, 2008 at 3:34 am)
cranberies abortion song = free to decidefriedman's book = free to choosevery similar results for the weak of the world
galaktar (June 19, 2008 at 7:18 pm)
Thats also why there is a of basic rights. i.e. freedoms that no one can take away no matter how unpopular they may be at a given time, or when given to a particular person.
Stevehtegreatgr (June 15, 2008 at 6:31 am)
That's why there should be a strong majority under such a system (67% or more). Indeed the 51% voting out the other 49% can become mob rule that's why we should be protected against such a future outcome.
Sundual22 (June 15, 2008 at 5:29 am)
and competition makes standards, when we dont like you, we can help people we do like to make profit by buying their products / services.
Sundual22 (June 15, 2008 at 5:26 am)
THE MAJORITY MAKES THE RULES FAGGOT
Sundual22 (June 15, 2008 at 5:26 am)
not everything is about your fuckin slimy ass.WE THE SOCIETY MAKE THE RULESTHATS FREEDOM, NOT YOUR FUCKIN SLIMY ASSES FREEDOM TO BE A SLIMY ASS.
BoulderBoy101 (June 15, 2008 at 4:10 am)
It's mob rule when 51 percent of the populace can vote away the rights of the 49 percent |
