|
Edd692 (July 23, 2008 at 12:53 am)
what the hell does this have to do with the qin and chin army?
insanepeng (July 22, 2008 at 10:35 pm)
fucking chinese
Shinoman2 (July 19, 2008 at 2:17 am)
your just mad cus japanese pll owned u r family haha douche bag :D
squallgzy (July 5, 2008 at 1:58 pm)
At that time, every kingdom in China was connected by blood realtionship. Zhou tianzi was the leader of every kings. However, the realtionship would fade because the time went. Kings respected Zhou tianzi at first, but with the time went, no king repected Zhou tianzi again.Every king wanted to be the next tianzi. Qin was the successer!
squallgzy (July 5, 2008 at 1:51 pm)
At that time, Zhou tianzi which means "the son of heaven" was still the leader of whole China, although he lost his power very early. It was duty for leaders of every kingdoms to protect Zhou tianzi together when other ethnics attacked him, although the leaders attacked each other very often.
allostericcortiso (June 8, 2008 at 11:32 pm)
"Zou tian zi"(the Son of the heaven)was still the divine ruler of all kindoms,though most of the time, it was just a title.Those kindoms'blood relationship fade away as time goes, but sometimes they did work together to repel barbarians invasion under the 尊王攘夷 war cry.
allostericcortiso (June 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm)
There was no justified war in spring-autum and warring states period. People say,the wars are about unification, but I prefer to took them as hegemony. It is kind of ridiculous to find that during spring autum era,those kings from same blood line,fight with eath other for the supremacy,and they act kind of just for fun.e.g: when one king failed the battle and surrendered,another king will just let go, and released the prisoners..but thounsands of soldiers died.
BatistaPwnzAll (June 8, 2008 at 7:08 pm)
batista would wreck chinas whole army
Aziaanx (June 6, 2008 at 4:28 am)
Japanese families were killed to you dumb fuck
agricolae101 (May 21, 2008 at 1:57 am)
FitzGerald, C. P. (Charles Patrick), "The southern expansion of the Chinese people':"southern fields and southern ocean", Canberra : Australian National University Press, 1972 |