|
ConnecticutFA (July 24, 2008 at 11:42 pm)
the props some times almost reach SS speed but you dont want them to. It causes the props to totally loose efficiency
cavenaghi9 (July 22, 2008 at 3:07 pm)
The Tu-95 doesn't go supersonic. The prop blades do.
marcdunord (July 21, 2008 at 9:27 pm)
crucial to producing even supersonic air trust with CR props is the fact that two CR blades that are about to meet at near-supersonic speed in absolute terms, *relative to each other* are actually approaching each other at a speed that is way above supersonic. so if the first blade pushes the air at say 800 km/h the second one can give it a ferocious 2nd slap because it actually hits the moving air at 1600+ km/h. the tu 95 could go supersonic no prob without its props' blades going supersonic.
mihailolord (July 14, 2008 at 12:27 am)
wow!!!!!!
SerbDav (July 11, 2008 at 10:03 am)
If you want to increase your current political knowledge check out on Youtube, Czech documentary STOLEN KOSOVO for the real truth concerning this issue!!! Kosovo je Srbija
futurefighterf22 (July 11, 2008 at 7:18 am)
non steaalth aircraft are no use anymore with all the advanced sams like s-400
Atomicskull (July 4, 2008 at 11:15 pm)
It's hilarious watching people get all worked up over which aircraft is "better" when they both are very similar but with a few different pluses and minuses. Grow up guys.
AV58 (June 28, 2008 at 4:32 pm)
like B52
mynameisntowens (June 25, 2008 at 1:51 am)
This plane is sill one of the most effective bombers ever made. The only bomber of the prop era which was FAR superior was the B-36 Peacemaker. BTW. The TU-95 will still be in service until 2040. Damn Russkies!
zeker111 (June 17, 2008 at 8:21 pm)
so what? Still can't be beaten |