|
hotrodkid7 (July 19, 2008 at 9:58 pm)
LOL id rather be in a suv then that honda civic
degnaw (July 19, 2008 at 3:32 am)
If the civic had hit the SUV side on as opposed to vise versa, the SUV driver would've at least been severely injured if not killed. It's not a fair comparison between a front (large crumple zone) and side impact (no crumple zone). Many cars do better than SUVs in side crash tests, so people who feel "invincible" in SUVs need to think again. Oh, and I doubt the civic would've rolled over several times upon colliding.
Growermnt (July 18, 2008 at 2:24 pm)
SUV sucks
thesolidussnake (July 18, 2008 at 12:55 am)
actually any car is 100% safe the most safe i know is drive responsabily
whiteTearz (July 17, 2008 at 10:52 pm)
FUCK not the civic!!lol
Lowerclergy (July 17, 2008 at 1:42 am)
what you said has nothing to do with what I said
PoppingPower (July 15, 2008 at 6:47 am)
are you sur that's not a Land Rover Discovery??Fucking 4X4, this shit are tank-city-car!!innadmisible, burn all morons who have this killer car!!!
Lowerclergy (July 15, 2008 at 1:27 am)
a ford f350 damn that sucks what does it get like 12 MPG
jacob5622 (July 14, 2008 at 6:26 pm)
To avoid injury, buy an SUV, and equip it with a bull/brush bar. And to those environmentally friendly peeps, buy one with a biodiesel, or hybrid engine. 'Nuff said.
Haze1219723433425 (July 14, 2008 at 12:03 pm)
Actually it was BMW that owned Land Rover, then they sold to Ford. |
