PoetryHound (July 10, 2008 at 6:03 pm)

power to the turtles

hopeitshappy (June 29, 2008 at 3:58 am)

power to the people

hitmankillyou (June 24, 2008 at 1:10 am)

poteryhound has been in here since this site opened and has had the same unbreakable opinion that nothing shadey went on to bring all three bldgs. down and the pentegon and the empty field in pa. he is a bebunker he is rite about one thing and that is noone seems to be intrested in this conspiracy but it has never declined it just never was noone was intrested to find out the truth people were more intrested in hannah montana or the muffin song or amercian idol the hit counter may notwork either

hitmankillyou (June 24, 2008 at 1:00 am)

poteryhound i see you're still lurking around in here trying to debunk everyones very sound opinion i've noticed dosent matter what someone says you're rite there to debunk it i bet you are a gov. funded debunker. dude the bldg. came down at free fall speed and straight down can you imagine the setup they would have to have to pull a building of that size down the size of the equip. would be mind blowing how come no videos of the equip. used to brindg it down dont forget 5 hrs after the impact

floppybollox3 (June 18, 2008 at 9:06 pm)

Let's see if this gets posted, Go see 'Seven is exploding' an italian report on the collapse of WTC7. PoetryHound says there were no explosions, no foreknowledge by NYFD or NYPD. Go check it out. Then you will recognise Poetryhound for what he is, a professional debunker who is paid to post on these sights to discredit any free-thinking. The net is full of them. Their language style is always the same. Do not even engage them, it's a waste of time, they are script-directed.

PoetryHound (June 18, 2008 at 9:37 am)

"Given that Silverstein uses the term 'Let's"Why do you keep insisting that he said that when he did not? Why are you stubbornly holding on to your ignorance and misinterpretation? So when he says "they" made that decision to pull, who do you think "they" refers to?

PoetryHound (June 18, 2008 at 9:37 am)

Actually, the 911 twoof movement is on the wane. Hits on conspiracy sites have plummeted. The number of YouTube videos with active arguments have plummeted. The size and frequency of 911 demonstrations and meetings has shrunk. The 911 twoof movement is doomed to its rightful place as a minor sociological oddity alongside moon landing deniers, holocaust deniers, and Princess Diana murder plot believers.

PoetryHound (June 18, 2008 at 9:37 am)

"All that is besides the point"I just pointed out your errors. Yeah, you'd LIKE it to be besides the point."as Silverstein confirms"No, you've misquoted & misinterpreted him."its obvious that all around would be expecting the collapse"Huh? Why would it be obvious? I thought you claimed it was a secret demolition. Are you saying everyone knew it was a demolition? Now you're more confused than ever."Jowenko is unequivocal"Actually, he's not. "I can't understand it," he says.

floppybollox3 (June 18, 2008 at 8:54 am)

Given that Silverstein uses the term 'Let's'(3rd person plural), and is recounting a conversation he had with others ('they')he is obviuosly familiar with who 'they' are, one would venture to add 'in cahoots'. He is talking about a process, a chain of events that ended in them (they)(who he knows) 'pulling' the building. This alone nullifies the official vesion that the building came down as a direct result of the collapse of WTC1/2.

floppybollox3 (June 18, 2008 at 8:48 am)

Anyway what is most interesting is that unlike aliens, the Kennedy assasination etc, 9/11 seems to have raised serious doubts in the minds of millions of people of all walks of life, from ordinary folk to academics, engineers, journalists,actors and scientists. Of course the typical debunkers line of attack is to label them all 'crazy' or 'nuts', but the insults will simply not make the too numerous inconsistencies in the official version go away, my friend. WTC7 is just the tip of the iceberg.