MoveOnDotOrgg (July 18, 2008 at 2:11 pm)

Mojito133: I wouldn't say Brosnan was a failure - I own and occasionally watch GOLDEN-EYE on DVD - I like it. It's the more graphic violence and new "feminine" metrosexual Bond I dislike - examples abound.

Mojito133 (July 18, 2008 at 7:17 am)

Brosnan days were a failure. Now Bond is top notch again.

Trafalgerish (July 8, 2008 at 5:04 am)

This blows. There goes one of the last films that doesn't belittle masculinity. Politically Correct bullshi* in hiring a metro-sexual to direct James BOND.I hope this pushes people's buttons.He directed "finding neverland"...jesus!By the way I liked that movie, but that same guy shouldn't go and make my James BOnd flicks as well.Anyway, I got my two cents in. Someones must say it.I miss the suave old days without fancy scenes that ruin not only bond films, but all films.

MoveOnDotOrgg (July 6, 2008 at 5:09 pm)

Mojito133: Potter is great - love it. It's Bond that has fallen from it's Sean Connery days, agree?

MoveOnDotOrgg (July 6, 2008 at 5:08 pm)

1999UTD: the initial Bond trailer began playing in the US last weekend of June '08.

MoveOnDotOrgg (July 6, 2008 at 5:06 pm)

gypmeister52: you thought Casino was good? Why?

MoveOnDotOrgg (July 6, 2008 at 5:06 pm)

Raford146: Harry Potter surprises you? Not me. As for Casino Royale being the highest box office take, THAT is a "WTF?!" given how they've emasculated the franchise and Bond - with blatant feminist leanings.

Raford146 (July 3, 2008 at 1:01 pm)

Harry Potter? WTF!?!?!?!

rvn3sqd (July 1, 2008 at 5:03 pm)

sheila's wheels. the trailer looked so good, then that advert

OsososoSexy (June 30, 2008 at 3:36 pm)

harry potter is shit!