|
Capeau (July 17, 2008 at 11:05 pm)
indeed i think directx 9 was the best version ever
drumstyx6464 (July 15, 2008 at 9:20 pm)
really all dx10 adds is support for different ways of rendering things, visually you can get pretty much the same from dx9....you wouldn't notice any less detail unless compared side by side. however, it DOES take longer to render with dx9, because obviously they've made improvements to efficiency
cncgeneral (July 13, 2008 at 9:30 pm)
It could but it couldn't do the lighting effects and all the stuff you tend not to realise is happening because it looks so real. If you can show me dx9 doing exactly the same thing then I will be very suprised.
roffleeeeezzz (July 9, 2008 at 7:08 pm)
oh, sorry.
asim18 (July 9, 2008 at 6:29 pm)
Chill out, i wasn't being serious!
roffleeeeezzz (July 9, 2008 at 6:18 pm)
asim18 is obviously retarded
GronkAkowA (June 27, 2008 at 6:04 pm)
wrong Oothey could've make half life 2 look exactly the same with directX 8.1 and if you look at the orge demo of nvidia and other techdemos, you'll see that dx9 is far more powerfull than most people think it is
daveaitken92 (June 24, 2008 at 2:21 pm)
ultimate and premium have no different ram requirements, i have 2gb ddr2 800mhz and that runs vista silky smooth, the reason you could be facing lag is problems with software that you are running of it, espescially as a few programs don't seem to work aswell with 64bit.
xMADvDOGx (June 23, 2008 at 2:08 pm)
whats about dx 11
ESFilmer (June 22, 2008 at 10:34 pm)
This... is... absolutely... sick... |
