afertyus1000 (July 15, 2008 at 4:11 pm)

no richters is the best

ibonykeys (July 7, 2008 at 6:56 pm)

Hanon is useless, Brahms' 51 exercises yield far superior results...

txabialgorta (July 3, 2008 at 6:15 pm)

duuuuuuuuude... your fingers are smoking!! technically VERY impressive, but melodically I think it's waaaaaaay too fast, it'd sound more pleasing a lil slower, I'd say... but enviable work nevertheless

Timmytimtimtm (July 2, 2008 at 1:38 am)

Playing the notes alone isn't a performance. It isn't meant for every pianist to play any piece they want, if it's hard for him he should not have recorded this in the first place, not every pianist is entirely perfect. But one who plays "Well" yes I do regard a "pianist". Even Richter did not perform some major works in public. Chopin didn't just put some notes one after the other to be performed fast. There was no interpretation whatsoever. OK, the last two lines were good but !!

OorvakanSar (July 2, 2008 at 12:27 am)

Cite your source, you are making things up

thiswastoogood (June 30, 2008 at 2:23 am)

you sure, because the fastest i've seen is richter, and he did it in 1:31, and they're comments on that video all over the place aruging that the video was sped upthe keys look like they don't even finish coming back up, because his hands are that fast, 48 sounds too unreal

horatiodreamt (June 26, 2008 at 11:05 pm)

Horowitz played this slower and brought the color in the right hand portion.

givemetime123 (June 24, 2008 at 9:21 pm)

Très belle version, technique parfaite, un peu de précipitation par moment et un peu de rubato.

dsgreycat (June 21, 2008 at 7:35 pm)

i like more lisitsa´s

psithurisms (June 21, 2008 at 6:52 pm)

play the entire hanon excercises book SUPER fast. and correctly 2. its hard but i'm sure it will provide results